Petition to stop the erection of new 5G transmitters in Devonport
Comments
#4
There has not been a balance for ratepayers and taxpayers between progress and the health and welfare of the public.Chris Clouston (Auckland, 2024-08-19)
#6
I am concerned about the effects of EMFAlso very ugly
Jo Murphy (Auckland, 2024-08-19)
#9
I am signing this petition because the immediate affects of these masts are detrimental to our health. I oppose the installation of them.Maria Bernard (Auckland, 2024-08-19)
#15
I live in Devonport im all for advance technology for phones etc 8 5g transmitters is pushing it to farNeil Scorgie (Auckland, 2024-08-20)
#20
The scientist speaking up on these emfs frying our brains and the animals have been silenced. Needs independent research that’s not paid by govtFi Groves (Auckland, 2024-08-21)
#22
It is so wrong. We don't want that bad energy anywhere, thank youDeb Bloodworth (North Shore, 2024-08-21)
#25
We don’t need 5G towers in Devonport and the cost benefit analysis is negative. Take your surveillance state and stick it up your arse.Gareth Hammett (Auckland, 2024-08-22)
#31
I do not want 5G near my home.John Ashley (Auckland, 2024-08-23)
#32
I live in a street where a 5G antenna is proposed without public consultation.Julie Ashley (Auckland, 2024-08-24)
#33
Peoples health should not be put at risk for big corporate money. These big coporations don't do unbiased safety or health testing for people and the enviroment and then they take no responsibility for the damage that they will cause.It is easy to cover up harm done with their big money and their basied campaigning while geniune concerns are ignored and silenced.
Sandra King (Auckland, 2024-08-24)
#34
I do not agree to this in residential streetsWe don’t know enough about side effects
Marieanna Barnaby (Auckland, 2024-08-24)
#36
I believe that 5G towers and small cell antenna arrays are a threat to public health.Anton Petrov (Auckland, 2024-08-25)
#40
I do not want to live in a world where we are getting fried by waves you can’t see. I don’t think we need more faster phones. I feel like it is a form of government tracking. And I want more trees not towers !!!Kauan Gracie (Devonport, 2024-08-26)
#41
I’m opposed to new 5 G towers going up in Devonport residential streets where children and family liveRebecca Wright (Auckland, 2024-08-26)
#43
I believe that these cell towers cause cancer and other bad effects on human and animal life.Barbara Chalk (Auckland, 2024-08-28)
#46
No 5G Towers, they are not good for our children s health.Deborah Wilkinson (0571, 2024-08-28)
#47
People's health is at stake with the effects the EMF Has on health. This is proven scientifically overseas. The risks far outweigh the benefits.Lisa Leveridge (Auckland, 2024-08-29)
#49
I don't feel the need for these towers, and I feel they are a definite health hazardTui Brenda Tregonning (Auckland, 2024-08-30)
#51
Harm outweighing benefitsDietmar Londer (Auckland, 2024-08-30)
#52
The potential health risks far outweigh any speed upgrade on my street. I don’t need my phone to be faster, I have WiFi in my house and 4G is just fine and good for communication.James King (Devonport, 2024-08-31)
#54
The radiation emitted from 5G towers pose serious health concerns to people and Nature as a whole with regards to 5G towers.They are also an eye sore in a beautiful place like Devonport.
Mary Allan (Auckland, 2024-09-02)
#57
Insufficient evidence of safetyRixt Brownlow (Auckland, 2024-09-05)
#62
I visit Devonport often and do not want to be exposed to untested levels of 1000's of frequencies of pulse modulated radio frequency and microwave radiation.Andy Hooley (Paraparaumu, 2024-09-06)
#63
5G is another way of gaining mass control and keeping the population sick.Taze ND (Auckland, 2024-09-06)
#64
5G is harmful to all life, especially kids who absorb radiation 10x more than Adults. It also affects bees, trees and other plants. On addition, I have seen no noticeable different in internet performance.Marina Macartney (Auckland, 2024-09-07)
#65
So much damage to health being caused, the towers must be stoppedLyn Veganforlife (Wellington, 2024-09-08)
#69
5G can cause cancer. This is from experience - a friend whose cancer was aggravated and she could feel what was happening. She sold up and moved elsewhere. People should not have to do that in Devonport!Mike Burton (Auckland, 2024-09-09)
#73
I believe the adequate safety checks on homeowners nearby and their exposure to cumulative emf smog have not been taken into account and monitored.I believe the government and council are being negligent.
Tonia Malva (Auckland, 2024-09-17)
#86
I'm signing because this issue will become a problem in all areas. The information available on the safety of 5g isn't looking good for us. Protect our children 🙏Sandra Owen (feilding, 2024-09-29)
#89
Concern about radio frequency from towers impacting health of nearby peopleTom Vanderlaan (Auckland, 2024-09-29)
#92
I have a radiation device that says how much radiation is from them and the radiation is very dangerous for us and animalsRachel Corkill (Queenstown, 2024-09-30)
#98
The suppression of truth in Science and Biology VS the FCC standards has gone on for too long, we have enough evidence, enough specialists and enough published literature to win in court. The High Court of New Zealand is currently corrupt as we have seen with the NZDSOS but the people will previal.michael Muldoon (Queenstown, New Zealand, 2024-10-02)
#99
These devices are not proven safe, it is shown that this radiation is harmful. Disease is undesirable and known risks should be managed, particularly there is an onus on responsible humans to protect children from risks such as thisMatt Bowden (Auckland, 2024-10-02)
#102
Sharon RobinsonSharon Robinson (Auckland, 2024-10-03)
#105
I strongly do not want nor need any more 5g apparatus in this area of Devonport ..Margaret Bainbridge (Auckland, 2024-10-05)
#107
I live locally and am not keen to add to the airwave pollution on Stanley PointChristine Ryan (Auckland, 2024-10-06)
#115
I'm signing this petition for two reasons:(1) There is a lot of hard scientific evidence that non-ionizing radiation has a myriad of bad health effects on humans, trees and insects: for details and mechanisms please see ******/ElectrosmogPockett
(2) Erection of cell towers close to houses dramatically reduces property values. This is unfair to residents who own the property.
Susan Pockett (Auckland, 2024-10-20)
#117
Wireless technology is slowly destroying living beings.It Attacks cellular DNA. DNA changes have roles and cancer causation in most important mutational changes and humans and diverse animals.
Chromosomal breaks, rearrangements, deletions duplications.
They also produce gene amplification.
A wide variety of changes a leading to lowered male fertility, lowered female fertility, increase spontaneous abortion etc.
Neurological – neuro psychiatric affects have become extremely widespread without technological advances in society namely: Sleep disturbance – insomnia – fatigue – tiredness – headache – depression depressive symptoms – lack of concentration – attention – cognitive dysfunction – dizziness vertigo – memory changes – restlessness anxiety stress education irritability.these findings are not just based on findings but are also based on profound impacts of EMFs levels well with our safety guidelines on the brain structure and function.
Apoptosis/ cell death.
Oxidative stress/Free radical damage.
Spread endocrine effects. Increases an intra cellular calcium levels following EMF exposure cancer causation. Val goes on and on mini pair review studies state all of these concerning factors.
Protect our children!
Denise Dryland (Auckland, 2024-10-20)
#121
I have studied and witnessed negative impacts on our health caused by 5G. I strongly opposed to the plan to bring 5G towers to resiudential areas.Aya Hirokawa (Auckland, 2024-10-22)
#123
Enough with the microwaving of the people!!!lesley jacobs (Northland, 2024-11-22)