#162: - Re: Re: A multi perspective view

Fraid not

#163: MPF/OCB - Re: Re: Re: A multi perspective view 

I've confirmed a case of mis-identification on my part! :-) Oops! I had tried to reach out to you because although we may have drawn different conclusions on the current school proposal, I would welcome the opportunity to understand more from your perspective, but would totally understand if you wish to remain anonymous.

Given people can conditionally conclude that they will be supportive or not supportive of the school planning application, this wider undestanding of more perspectives may be a useful influence on how people respond. Afterall it doesn't have to be a straight Agree / Oppose. Responses can be made with observations or even caveats e.g. fundamentally the site is fine, the land use is fine, but would like to see further consideration given to entry/exit points, or even that they support conditional that this is the only development that appears on the site for x period of time, or, fundametally oppose the the site as proposed, but if x y and z was done then this would reduce opposition. Of course there will be people who will only oppose for particular reasons to them, and that's OK, but it would still be good to understand why, as that helps others gain the perspectives.  

Incidentally, some of your reflections on days gone by, which you kindly shared, are still reflected in some "modern" households e.g. long working weeks, and valued family time, playing sport, going for walks, away from games consoles and TVs etc,  :-)

Keep well!