BBEC PANTS 2017

Comments

#2

there diagusting nd over priced

(bradford, 2017-07-11)

#3

Ridiculous shoes will have logos by 2020

(bradford, 2017-07-11)

#10

They are far too wide, children are all different sizes and they are not available with adjustable waists lengths etc.

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#11

Price is ridiculous, style is ridiculous. No evidence to suggest they help child development

(BRADFORD, 2017-07-11)

#14

I think the pants are awful and just trying to get more money out of people

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#16

The pants are ugly and I'm not wearing them lol@bbec no

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#17

It's hard enough getting my daughter to wear school pant the ones you want her to wear are well to Baggy

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#19

I am signing due to this school thinking more about what the children wear and not their education they have already got their Blazers with badge on so why keep changing the uniform the school needs to re think and think about the children's education and that they attend school.

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#20

THEIR horrid

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#21

They are far too expensive for growing children when u can get tailored pants cheaper at Asda, Tesco, Matalan ETC

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#24

I'm signing because the pants are horrendous

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#25

Too expensive and horrible

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#28

The trousers are far too expensive for a growing child that will need to get multiple pairs throughout the year, and the style is not suitable for all shapes and sizes where adjustable waists etc are required

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#29

It's getting ridiculous the control schools think they can have on OUR children. No evidence to suggest it makes better learning.
Children are all different shapes and sizes, why should the children be made to feel uncomfortable. It's expensive enough to clothe a GROWING child in uniform without adding the extra price of logo pants.. It's ridiculous

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#31

They are way to expensive and are a very poor and will make em get bullyed!

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#32

Every child is a different build and the style is ridiculous, the price is far to dear and i dont understand how having pants with the logo on is going to help/affect the childs learning

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#36

Why have logo on pants when blazer will cover it up

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#38

Why should I Be made to buy these trousers when My children have always worn the correct uniform, all because some children flout the uniform which they will still do regardless. Also what about parents who are struggling financially and can't afford £9 per pair rather than £4 per pair. Finally the uniform shops then have the monopoly on pricing.

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#40

The trousers are awful...they are baggy and not fit for purpose. Also a further expence to working parents. If the school want to change the pants they 1 need to redesign them and 2 talk to pupils about any changes first...my daughter WILL NOT WEAR THESE CLOWN PANTS

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#43

Rip off and will look awful.

(bradford, 2017-07-11)

#45

Feel so sorry for for bbec hahahha

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#48

The pants are awful and i am not wesring them no chance

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#55

I do not fancy looking like a dipshit quite frankly.

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#56

Our clothes show our gender identity and me and a lot of other girls in my year feel as though the pants are targeted towards boys. It is extremely unfair that girls don't get to wear the pants they are comfortable in because a lot of teenage girls are quite self conscious about their bodies. We should not have to worry about males looking at our curves and perfections. This is Very gender biased and making girls feel uncomfortable in the pants they don't enjoy wearing which will also distract them from work at school.

(BRADFORD, 2017-07-11)

#58

A) they are disgusting and will not look smart on both my childrens frames b) neither my children or i were consulted about this change c) these are NOT affordable for parents on a budget whos children grow dramatically and need 3+ pair throughout the year d) i gave birth to my children, am solely their responsible legal guardian until 18 and will decide what to buy my children and not be told e) the uniform i provide is as stated by school policy and my children and my pocket should not suffer as a consequence of other parents failure to do the same f) i wouldnt wear em and g) my children are at the age of been extremely apperance conscious & i encourage them to wear what they feel comfortable in.

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#62

I feel that the trousers are not suitable for all the children fat, thin short tall they wont fit all child right l. They should be able to wear trousers what they like want and suits there shape.trousers do not effect there education and the price is rediculas.

(Bradford, 2017-07-11)

#65

The area this school is in houses poorer households. The cost of these pants is three times what some would pay for one pay. Some have more than one child in school and each child needs at least two pairs. Nothing wrong with the plain black they have at present, the look smart and are within everyones price range.

(Bradford, 2017-07-12)

#68

The pants are horrendous and cost way more !!!

(Bradford, 2017-07-12)

#70

I don't like the new pants

(Bradford, 2017-07-12)

#72

I'm signing because no one wants to wear these school pants

(Bradford, 2017-07-12)

#74

Think this is a lot of money to pay for a pair of school pants

(Bradford, 2017-07-12)

#77

These pants are well ugly and there way to big lol

(Braford, 2017-07-12)

#78

There pointless and over priced no need for them what's so ever and costing £15 a pair £30-£45 for enough to cover the week is ridiculous

(Bradford, 2017-07-12)

#84

Sort out the school first; not the uniform!

(Bradford, 2017-07-12)

#86

There dirty, trying to get more money out of people

(Bradford, 2017-07-12)

#87

Just don't like them to wide for my daughter she will look like a clown

(Braford, 2017-07-12)

#90

Ridiculous idea!

(Bradford, 2017-07-12)

#92

These haven't even come in yet an my 2 girls are already upset and feeling uncomfortable about them I feel it's disgusting that they are being made to feel self-conscious and so unsettled that they don't even want to go back after 6 week hoidays also the price is way too high for most parents in this area

(Bradford, 2017-07-12)

#95

The school pant my son won't wear, even I wudnt wear them .. I have never see anything so ugly..

(Bradford, 2017-07-13)

#97

The pants are ******* shite and this new headteacher must be loco

(Bradford, 2017-07-13)

#99

Parents yet again forced to pay more for uniforms

(Bradford, 2017-07-13)

#101

Its a school not the army ..dont be regimented with teenagers..it doesn't work...they wont ware those horrible pants...they will all end up in the unit and this will disrupt their education...sort the learning out first..

(Bradford, 2017-07-13)

#102

my daughters will look like clowns in those trousers they prefer skinny ones plus they will be more expensive compared to what i'm used to paying! don't see tje point for such a tiny logo!!

(Bradford, 2017-07-13)

#105

The trousers are hideous and in this day and age no child would even contemplate wearing them.
This is 2017 not 1999

(Bradfotd, 2017-07-14)

#106

The trousers are not nice and the children should be able to wear black trousers if there choice the blazers are bad enough it's an awful uniform

(Bradford, 2017-07-14)

#111

I'm sighning because girls are supost to feel comfaterbal in what they wear and with these pant I dont think I will feel comfortable wearing them

(bradford, 2017-07-15)

#112

Overpriced and pointless as the logo won't be visible once blazer is on. My daughter is tall and slim and the school has not taken into consideration all the different body types.

(Bradford, 2017-07-16)

#114

Too expensive!!!! my son had 6 pairs last year due to growing spurts, at £15.00 a pair that's a lot of money, especially on top, of the new blazer, tie p.e kit, that also have to be logo specific, shoes (no tags), astroturf trainers and football boots, that no longer fit.....

(Halifax, 2017-07-16)

#117

They are horrid

(west Yorkshire, 2017-07-17)

#118

My daughter won't wear these pants

(Bradford, 2017-07-17)

#119

My daughter hates them they look so bad even I wudnt wear them

(Bradford, 2017-07-17)

#122

The pants that we are wearing are too expensive and there too baggy why can't we have skirts??

(Bradford, 2017-07-19)

#123

There are expensive, cheaply made, the badge scratches the leg on the inside, really bad fit have to buy 2 sizes bigger, too long and will now have to pay to have them taken up. Rubbish!!!!!

(Bradford, 2017-08-12)

#127

As long as the pupils wear black trousers what is the problem ? The pants are a awful tight fit and my daughter needed 2 sizes bigger but so did alot more girls they also need taking up as there made e tra long

(Brasford, 2017-08-31)

#129

There a rip off the sizing is small

(Bradford, 2017-08-31)

#130

There excuses for having them are ridiculous

(Bradford, 2017-09-09)