Say no to stalybridge mosque

#572: -  I never stated what proportion of Halal was pre or unstunned just that I was strongly opposed to the latter due to its inherent barbarity and cruelty and the fact that British slaughtermen would be prosecuted for doing so, and that having separate laws for different cultures within the same country was dangerous, unfair and divisive. People are prosecuted for animal cruelty or neglect if the stunning failure is due to negligence if caught, unless of course they're practising Halal/Kosher (or is that anti-Semitic) in which case they're let off when inflicting deliberate and totally unnecessary suffering, an indefensible and appalling state of affairs. It manifestly IS far more cruel to deliberately slit the throat of an animal when fully conscious as opposed to unconscious, that's why stunning was introduced in the first place. Why comment about the proportions stunned and unstunned if you really do equate the two.