The Blackwall Tunnel Fines planned must shurely be illegal also

This is now riddiculus. The Mayor of London is going absolutely AWOL with these charges for road passage and use..

https://greenwichwire.co.uk/2024/07/10/blackwall-and-silvertown-tunnel-tolls-revealed/

The cost cannot be to road users. It is free and must be free. Maybe this Tunnel is outside the old city? But i think they already broke the law and need to be put to legal impeachment for this.

I personally think that all these Tolls were illegal at the time....because they still charge for passage through London.

The point is to attract and allow merchants and travellers. Not charge them..after these tolls were erected around (not within) the city.. people might have then avoided London and gone around it. But it is meant to be the Watling Street free passage and if one of these tolls or two are on Watling Street then shurely they were illegal?

Map of all the Old Tolls confirms none within the Ancient City!!!

So, here you have it. This website has documented a map for us of all the old Tolls of Lomdon!

https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/map-of-london-and-its-toll-gates-from-1857-2304/

None are within the Original City because it is against Magna Carta!

Also i will check but there shouldnt be any on Watling Street or Ermine Street! If there are then that is illegal!

Evidence on the Tax and maintenance model for roads kept from Magna Carta

As i was researching Privileges law from William III i found these acts of law passed around 1700 and there is good indication through these acts how the taxes for roads, courts (council) and tolls were run. I dont find any for the Kings road here.. but there are a lot of petitions and other evidence... Its worth noting these

COUNCIL / ROADS

William III, 1695-6: An Act for repairing the Highways betweene the City of London and the Towne of Harwich in the County of Essex. [Chapter IX. Rot. Parl. 7&7 Gul. III.p.4.nu.7.] | British History Online

https://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol7/pp66-68

COUNCIL / HIGHWAYS

William III, 1695-6: An Act for the better amending & repairing the High-ways and Explanac[i]on of the Laws relateing thereunto. [Chapter XXIX. Rot. Parl. 7 & 8 Gul. III. p. 6. n. 3.] | British History Online

https://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol7/pp120-121

COUNCIL

William III, 1695-6: An Act for repairing the Highways betweene the City of London and the Towne of Harwich in the County of Essex. [Chapter IX. Rot. Parl. 7&7 Gul. III.p.4.nu.7.] | British History Online

https://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol7/pp66-68

COUNCIL / ROADS

William III, 1697-8: An Act for repairing the Highways from the Towne of Birdlipp and the Top of Crickley Hill in the County of Gloucester to the City of Gloucester. [Chapter XVIII. Rot. Parl.9 Gul. III.p.3.n.7.] | British History Online

https://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol7/pp371-374

TAX / COUNCIL / ROAD

William III, 1695-6: An Act for the more easie Recoverie of Small Tythes. [Chapter VI. Rot. Parl. 7 & 8 Gul. III. P.4. nu. 1.] | British History Online

https://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol7/pp62-63

COUNCIL / ROADS

William III, 1696-7: An Act for explaining and enforcing the Act for paving and cleansing the Streets within the Cities of London and Westminster and Borough of Southwark... [Chapter XXXVII. Rot. Parl. 8 & 9 Gul.III.p.11. nu.6.] | British History Online

https://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol7/pp291-292

Update petition amalgamation details and signature count

So...Mr Dave Fowlers petition case number 652161 is not the only case because now i have found that there are also cases 618266, 633550, 637517,  & 599985 are documented on the House of Commons public record of which there in fact has been a debate, and i dont know why but these were NOT showing up in the petition search field when i typed ULEZ before....  They are a bit older than the Dave Fowler petition, though. 

So this makes the total of signatures from the parliament cases as follows....

55,520 signed

27,340 signed

10,980 signed

6,661 signed

1,983 signed

= 102,484 signatures

So i will have to edit the details slightly on the main petition and put the grand total to 579,235 including these 15.

Parliamentary Privileges Act 1770

Parliamentary Privileges Act 1770 applies to citizens and with where the cognisance of the cause that has arisen rests. For exemple The House of Commons or House of Lords, Privy Council or His Majestys Government. 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/apgb/Geo3/10/50

Parliamentary Privileges Act 1737

The Original full act is not currently published s1 - s3 or the previous act it amends only s4.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/apgb/Geo2/11/24

Previous Act being around 1700-1701 in the twelth and thirteenth year of William III

An act for preventing any inconveniences that may happen by privilege of parliament

1604: 1 James 1 c.13: Privilege of Parliament Act

1604 privileges of parliament act

1604: 1 James 1 c.13: Privilege of Parliament Act

https://statutes.org.uk/site/the-statutes/seventeenth-century/1604-1-james-1-c-13-privilege-of-parliament-act/

These are just some of the absolutely mind bending injuries against citizens from these fines

This must be Apocalyptic  760 private vehicles unlawfully taken and sold!!! To who?! Not people in London!!! How can that be undone?! 600 or so taken illegaly by evil bailifs!!! Still in posession!!

This must stop!!!

If i even spelled that right. How can one man Kahn the London Mayor bear the responsibility for this?

Donald Trump was shot at. Kahn has been sent a bullet in the post?! What a scapegoat. This is Transport for Londons fault and their legal team.

Must we have more and more and more corruption to evade liability and confessions?? When will it end?

Here .. it is reported...

TfL is owed an astonishing £370 million in unpaid ULEZ fines. Only £25 million in unpaid fines have been recouped.

1,400 vehicles were seized by baillifs for nonpayment of fines in the year ending July 2024. About 760 of them were auctioned off thus recovering about £710,000 - a tiny fraction of the £370 million owed.

The initial fine for non-payment of the £12.50 daily ULEZ charge is £180 but this is halved to £90 if it is paid within 14 days. It increases to £270 of it remains unpaid after 28 days. £90, £180 or £270 is a lot of money to a lot of people.

Many of the fines are levied in vehicles registered outside the Greater London area or outside England or the UK. Those fines are obviously difficult and expensive to collect. It’s difficult to seize a car registered in Ireland or Ukraine.

Mayor Sadiq Khan was warned about the injustice of this before he extended the ULEZ. But he went ahead regardless and as a result TfL is now owned £370 million. That money isn’t available to TfL for investment in infrastructure or bus or rail services

Here are two of the campaign funds for Stop Ulez which are both group 9 bodies with a political objective, non - proffit, non corporate. Value added tax act 1994

These funds prove the body of people subscribed to the political purpose and non proffit objective. Therefore those must be recognised in law and by the courts. Where legal funding. Including privileges of the body and its members. Not doing so for champerty but for actuall active engagement and facilitating the advertising.  So why has this body had to use funds for criminal defence. When it is privileged? Only liable to civil action.

https://justgiving.com/crowdfunding/StopTheULEZnow?fbclid=IwY2xjawF88ZhleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHYEhyyQE6M3bQvxhB7MhdYp-7PlbGrAeyijpHUNAybBEGhpdt2dbhng5JQ_aem_cTzFMiq24Pe5e8vGB6S4Aw

https://www.gofundme.com/f/action-against-ulez?utm_campaign=p_cp%20share-sheet&utm_content=undefined&utm_medium=copy_link_all&utm_source=customer&utm_term=undefined&s=09&fbclid=IwAR0ProUxFULpqLRKUTwLYeukUQn4okXp0nexbwy82YS9SoSl0HDCzY3ZzDk

Here is one of the main Facebook groups of 83,000 members who are supporting these petitions

Either directly signed or otherwise helping to share and raise awareness of these issues. 83,000 citizens, electors.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/stoptheulez/?ref=share

Share this petition

Help this petition to reach more signatures.

How to promote a petition?

• Share the petition on your Facebook wall and in groups related to the topic of your petition.
• Contact your friends
  1. Write a message where you explain why you have signed this petition, since people are more likely to sign it if they understand how important the topic is.
  2. Copy and paste the web address of the petition into your message.
  3. Send the message using email, SMS, Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, Skype, Instagram and LinkedIn.